Here I want to concentrate on another source of error, namely, processes that take place within magma chambers. To me it has been a real eye opener to see all the processes that are taking place and their potential influence on radiometric dating. Radiometric dating is largely done on rock that has formed from solidified lava. Lava properly called magma before it erupts fills large underground chambers called magma chambers.
Myths Regarding Radiocarbon Dating
Carbon dating alternatives? | Naked Science Forum
A quick flash to a chart during the debate purportedly showing so, and far too much to read in a second, and then on to somethig else. Gish Gallop springs to my mischevious mind. So did Ham have a point that a piece of year old timber was found in a rock purportedly 45, years old? My sympathies lie completely with the currently accepted scientific methods of dating rocks, the Earth, the universe … but, and it is a discussion, is there room for doubt? Without the reference to the alleged finding, it is impossible to be specific.
Extra-solar and extra-terrestrial material is very hard to date, which works for you
There may be an issue with the delivery of your newspaper. This alert will expire at NaN. Click here for more info. Recover password. But Marvin Rowe is no nut.
Radiometric Dating Methods. Table of Contents. Peru's Fossil Whales. Cosmogenic Isotope Dating. Himalayas 10 times younger than previously thought?